Supreme Court of Kansas April 15, 2016, 112982 (State v. Shank)

Also known as

United States · · · 15-04-2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 112,982

STATE OF KANSAS,

Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM ANDREW SHANK,

Appellant.

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

1.

Generally, it is within the trial court's sound discretion to determine whether a

sentence should run consecutive to, or concurrent with, another sentence.

2.

Judicial discretion is abused if judicial action (1) is arbitrary, fanciful, or

unreasonable, i.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.