Supreme Court of Kansas April 15, 2016, 112982 (State v. Shank)
Also known as
United States · · · 15-04-2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS
No. 112,982
STATE OF KANSAS,
Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM ANDREW SHANK,
Appellant.
SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
1.
Generally, it is within the trial court's sound discretion to determine whether a
sentence should run consecutive to, or concurrent with, another sentence.
2.
Judicial discretion is abused if judicial action (1) is arbitrary, fanciful, or
unreasonable, i.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit