New York Court of Appeals June 2, 2016 (In re Frelix)

Also known as

United States · · · 02-06-2016

*1061On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals (see 22 NYCRR 500.9, 500.10). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by the Rules of the Court of Appeals (see 22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.