District Court, D. Minnesota May 5, 2016, Civ. No. 15-1845 (RHK/BRT) (Nash v. Optomec, Inc.)

Also known as

United States · · · 05-05-2016

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD H. KYLE, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

In this action, Plaintiff Thomas Nash alleges that his former employer, Defendant Optomec, Inc. (“Optomec”), terminated his employment on account of his age in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Minn. Stat. § 368A.01 et seq.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.