Missouri Court of Appeals March 7, 2017, No. ED 104144 (St. Louis Bank v. Brutus Construction, LLC)
Also known as
United States · · · 07-03-2017
ORDER
PER CURIAM
The present dispute arises from the appointment of a receiver in May of 2013, after Brutus Construction allegedly defaulted on a promissory note. Brutus Construction filed a Rule 74.06(b) motion in February of 2016, asking that the appointment of the receiver and “all orders and judgments” from the cause be set aside as void.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit