Missouri Court of Appeals March 7, 2017, No. ED 104144 (St. Louis Bank v. Brutus Construction, LLC)

Also known as

United States · · · 07-03-2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The present dispute arises from the appointment of a receiver in May of 2013, after Brutus Construction allegedly defaulted on a promissory note. Brutus Construction filed a Rule 74.06(b) motion in February of 2016, asking that the appointment of the receiver and “all orders and judgments” from the cause be set aside as void.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.