Court of Appeals of Oregon September 12, 2018, A160983 (State v. Miller)
Also known as
United States · · · 12-09-2018
ARMSTRONG, P. J.
*730*2The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to dismiss the punitive contempt case against him because, he contends, the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the contempt complaint. We conclude that the court did not err and, accordingly, affirm.
The facts, for purposes of appeal, are not disputed.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit